www.Goldivas.com
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

No Public Option, No Deal! Options · View
Terry
Posted: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:55:00 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
It's time for everyone to contact your congresspeople and let them know your thoughts. It's an outrage that the plan presented by Max Baucus ignores the opinions of a majority of U.S. citizens who favor a public option. Why are they afraid to give everyone more choices? I think the answer lies in the MASSIVE contributions they receive from the insurance industry.
Diane
Posted: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:58:46 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 222
Location: Florida
Probably my favorite part of having a public option besides feeling safe if I'm in the hospital needing treatment for me or my kids would be knowing that CEO's would no longer be able to pay themselves 300-400 times what their average employee makes.
Rita@Goldivas
Posted: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 7:24:00 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 309
Location: Colorado
I completely agree. I just called Max Baucus' office to express my feeling about his garbage plan - (202) 224-2651
Terry
Posted: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 7:45:41 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
Here's a short video of Robert Reich speaking about the Public Option: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/09/robert-reich-explains-the_n_280639.html
Nancy
Posted: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:41:11 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/8/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 210
Location: Richmond
I thought President Obama's speech tonight was excellent. And I was appalled at the behavior of some of the congressmen, especially SC Rep Joe Wilson yelling "you lie"! If I lived in his district, I would be so embarassed now.
Diane
Posted: Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:49:11 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 222
Location: Florida
I was happy to see that Joe Wilson's opponent in their upcoming election received over $40K in campaign contributions last night!

But, I'm angry that the proposed public option does not cover abortions. Doesn't that mean it offers less coverage than a private plan?
Rita@Goldivas
Posted: Thursday, September 10, 2009 5:57:18 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 309
Location: Colorado
Diane, you're not alone in feeling that way. Here are the results of a poll published on the National Women's Law Center website:
Reproductive Health Coverage in Health Reform
A national opinion survey conducted for the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) demonstrates that Americans strongly believe that health insurance should include women’s reproductive health services and that medical experts – not politicians – should decide the details of a benefits package.

Findings from the survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted by the Mellman Group include:

Voters overwhelmingly support the broad outlines of reform and requiring coverage of women’s reproductive health services. Seven-in-ten (70%) favor a proposal that establishes a National Health Insurance Exchange with a public plan option. If the reform were adopted, voters overwhelmingly support requiring health plans to cover women’s reproductive health services (71% favor-21% oppose).
Absent coverage for women’s reproductive health services, majorities oppose reform. If reform eliminated current insurance coverage of reproductive health services such as birth control or abortion, nearly two-thirds (60%) would oppose the plan and nearly half (47%) would oppose it strongly.
Supporting coverage of comprehensive reproductive health services would benefit Members of Congress. A plurality (45%) would feel more favorably toward their Representative if they voted to cover reproductive services, while 24% would feel less favorably, and 32% said it would make no difference.
Voters would feel much less favorably about their Representative if they voted to cover services like Viagra for men, but excluded reproductive services for women. Voters overwhelmingly reported that they would feel less favorably toward their Member of Congress if they voted for reproductive services for men and not for women (71%), while only 9% would feel more favorably toward their Representative.
Voters want an independent commission to make coverage decisions, not politicians. A strong majority of voters (75%) prefer that an independent commission of citizens and medical professionals make decisions about what should be covered under reform rather than the President and Congress (17%). Fully 73% of voters want an independent commission to decide whether abortion should be covered, while just 16% want the President and Congress involved.
Even in the face of opposition arguments, majorities support requiring coverage of abortions under reform. After hearing strong arguments both for and against covering abortion under reform, two-thirds (66%) support coverage, agreeing that health care, not politics, should drive coverage decisions. A majority of voters (72%) reported that they would feel angry if Congress mandated by law that abortion would not be covered under a national health care plan.
Voters want rules to stop insurance companies from discriminating against women. Even in the face of industry claims of too much government interference, 62% agree that reform should establish new rules to treat everyone fairly and stop discrimination, while far fewer (32%) side with opponents’ claims.
Nancy
Posted: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:44:24 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/8/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 210
Location: Richmond
Diane, the contributions to Joe Wilson's opponent have now reached $400,000! That will teach Wilson some manners, I think.
Diane
Posted: Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:02:39 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 222
Location: Florida
Here's a good comment about Joe Wilson, from the Huffington Post:

"Wow- I did not think Joe Wilson could be any more of a tool and then, I read the article that he is currently on government run healthcare, that he loves the program and that he wants to make sure it isn't touched in the reform that he is trying to shutdown. Joe is so clearly out for his own self-interest and touting the party line that it cannot be any more obvious. He is pretty much saying, I deserve better care than everyone else in the country and I would rather block the rest of you from getting great care like I do. The prototypical congressman and the reason this country despises government officials at times with their lies and corrupt nature. He embodies that greedy, egotistical, ignorant, lazy, pathological liar who gets into government for his own selfish gains not caring about the people or a better society in the least. GET OUT OF OFFICE JOE! You slimeball!"



Terry
Posted: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:26:19 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
We're getting down to the wire on the public option now that Congress is back in session. If your senators haven't heard from you, now is the time to make your feelings known.
Terry
Posted: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 12:37:35 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
Things are really heating up now! The insurance companies are pulling out all the stops and doing everything they can to scare people about healthcare reform. Their latest target is older people, the insurance comapnies want to convince them that healthcare reform means they lose benefits, the ads are deliberate lies.
Diane
Posted: Saturday, October 31, 2009 6:37:55 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 222
Location: Florida
Yes, there are millions being spent to convince people that the public option is a bad idea. And Millions being poured into legislator's pockets! We all need to do what we can to make our wishes known, and to let congress know we won't forget them at primary time.
Nancy
Posted: Sunday, November 08, 2009 8:58:40 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/8/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 210
Location: Richmond
It's good news from the House, but it's a tragedy that women were sold out in the adoption of the Stupak Amendment that limits coverage for reproductive rights. We need to work on overturning that ASAP. Still, this is a start.
Terry
Posted: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:11:52 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
I agree, now it will be interesting to see what the Senate does.
Rita@Goldivas
Posted: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:53:47 PM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/17/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 309
Location: Colorado
I was dismayed (but not surprised) at the Republican men in the House shouting the Democrat women down - http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/10/kilroy-gop-sexist/ - how do Republican women rationalize this? Compete violation of rules, and basic civility. It brings up a lot of memories of boorish, sexist behavior on the part of some men, I hoped it was a thing of the past.
Nancy
Posted: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:13:55 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/8/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 210
Location: Richmond
Yes, it's "deja vue all over again" when some men treat women like that. Some men (and maybe some women as well) will never change.

The Stupak amendment just has to go. This is such a slap in the face to women! Here is a good article: http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=democrats_leave_women_behind
Terry
Posted: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:08:15 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
The Senate bill is a huge disappointment, the so-called "public option" is so watered down, and it's not really an option for most people. It would only be available to those who don't have insurance, etc., etc. What a scam!
Terry
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2009 7:29:50 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
Now there is an amendment that lets people leave their employer's plan for the public option if they choose to, so it looks like we're actually making progress here!
Diane
Posted: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 7:33:19 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/11/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 222
Location: Florida
Yes Terry, there is reason to be optimistic. But I'm seeing a huge push by conservatives and the insurance industry to haul out all the old scare tactics again. So we need to keep up the fight now, don't get complacent.
Terry
Posted: Saturday, January 23, 2010 10:06:57 AM
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/12/2008
Posts: 0
Points: 291
Location: Minneapolis
The upset in MA has changed everything. But I'm disappointed to hear the Dems talking about possibly watering down the healthcare bill even further to make it acceptable to Repubs. I think that conclusion is completely wrong. When a majority of voters favor a strong public option and dissapprove of behind-the-scenes deal-making, maybe it's time for congress to stand up and give the people what we want. They need a big dose of courage to get this done, I'm hoping they will understand voters will not tolerate the concessions to industry, backroom deals and so on. We voted for CHANGE, not more of the same.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Goldivas Created by Rajesh Sharma (Rajesh-Sharma.com)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.7 (NET v2.0) - 11/20/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.278 seconds.